Quick Search
Threads: 188
Posts: 724
Members: 188
Welcome to our newest member, magician123456


 
01/12/2007 - The new exciting CRPTechnology Forum is waiting for you!

  Automotive Engineering Forum. Crp Technology > MotorSports Related Discussions > MotorSports Forum: Others...

MotorSports Forum: Others... MotorSports Forum. Here it's possible to speak about other motor sports news, rules, rumours

Tags: ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06 February 2007
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
Default Iniezione diretta o indiretta per motore 2 tempi da gara?

La grande voglia di avere a disposizione una iniezione sul 2 tempi mi porta a disquisire sullo stato dell'arte di questa applicazione. Chiaramente si sà un tot su questa iniezione ma per il racing e specialmente per i piccoli motori 2 tempi (125cc) quale si ritiene possa essere più performante? Infatti il problema per il racing non è il consumo ridotto o/e l'emissione in atmosfera di idrocarburi incombusti e quindi antiecologici ( HC= - 5 g/kWh) in quanto si tratta di piccolissime quantità che, come problema ecologico, è meno di una goccia d'acqua nel Pacifico, ma bensì il rendimento ideale del motore legato ai problemi di misfiring e comunque a cattiva combustione che potrebbe pregiudicare la potenza del motore. Penso infatti che il massimo rendimento si abbia se limitiamo la perdita di combustibile incombusto dallo scarico, conseguente al lavaggio. A questo proposito sarebbe auspicabile che il carburante non venisse coinvolto nel processo di lavaggio e venisse immesso all'interno del cilindro indipendentemente dall'aria.

Last edited by robby : 07 February 2007 at 13:29.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09 February 2007
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8
Default English version

The great wish to have a 2-stroke injection brings me to discuss on the real development of this technology. Obviously it is well known but for racing applications, and in particular for small 2 stroke engines (125cc), which one do you think is more performing? In fact, concerning Racing, the problem is not due to achieve a reduced consumption, neither the HC emissions in atmosphere, but the ideal efficiency of the engine. In fact, misfiring problems and a bad combustion can jeopardize the power output. I think that the best performance is achieved if you limit the loss of non-burnt fuel. To do this it would be better to have the fuel directly and separated from the air injected in the cylinder.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 13 February 2007
Ing Ing is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4
Default

Hi,
the problem in a 2 stroke engine for a direct injection it's the time for charge mixing.
If you inject when the exaust it's closed you haven't time for mixing and combustion it will be irregular. For this reasons same factory (as like Honda) used the indirect injection in their GP engines. The injector was in the carter. In this way you control very well the ratio air-fuel end there is time necessary for a correct mixing.
In a GP engine this problem is very important because it's work to very high rpm!

Ing.i
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:00.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0